Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Response To RNAO Position Statement

Parker Gallant has authored a response to a 'blinkered' position statement from RNAO

The Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) on March 3, 2012 released a paper titled “RNAO Position Statement on Healthy Energy Solution” which effectively was a rehash of ideas and other papers issued by the likes of Environmental Defence, Pembina and Greenpeace Canada. In summary the RNAO suggests, nay recommends; that Ontario immediately close all coal-fired plants (well, not quite: they suggest we put them on standby while we erect more wind turbines), abandon any thoughts of building or refurbishing new nuclear plants, and use gas generation plants as peaking power until we have enough renewables (wind, solar and biomass) to supply our needs.

The RNAO also suggests wind could supply 20% of our needs while recommending closing down nuclear which supplied 57% of Ontario's consumption in 2011. Where the difference of 37% will come from is anyone's guess but perhaps they see the difference coming from conservation which they also push. A “tongue in cheek” report prepared by Aegent Energy estimated that Ontario would require approximately 12,000 industrial wind turbines (IWTs) to replace our existing nuclear plants and those 12,000 IWTs would use up 14,000 square kilometres of Ontario's land mass. Presumably much of that land mass would be valuable farm land which would effectively reduce our ability to produce cheap abundant food for consumption.

Their report points to the heavy costs of coal-fired generation citing the same worn-out DSS report prepared in 2005 that is used by the Liberal Energy Ministers and the same groups that the RNAO cite as their primary sources of “studies.” That DSS report was prepared for the Liberal Government and provided four scenarios with the one always used as the “worst case” which was when coal-fired generation was contributing 25% of our consumption without the benefit of “scrubbers” to remove most particulates related to asthma related medical conditions. The study by DSS was never peer reviewed and the modelling estimates of environmental related deaths was severely criticized by Professor Ross McKitrick of the University of Guelph. His review concluded: “Overall the DSS05 Report does not provide credible support for the decision to close the Ontario coal-fired power plants. As has been found previously the pollution increments attributable to OPG facilities are extremely small across Southern Ontario except in the immediate vicinity of the power plants themselves.”

The closing of the nuclear generation plants in the province as the RNAO recommends would entail replacing that power with unreliable, intermittent power from wind and solar that would require fossil fuel generation (gas) to back it up. The net effect would be to push up the cost of electricity even further. This would exacerbate the current effect on many Ontario residents putting more and more people into energy poverty. Does the RNAO want Ontarians to choose between feeding themselves or trying to keep warm. The burden placed on people living on fixed incomes would require massive social benefits to sustain them in a province that is burdened with increasing deficits and debt and can ill afford even our current levels. The effect of higher electricity prices; drives out industrial plants from the Province, increases unemployment, and makes Ontario an unattractive destination for any investment that may create new jobs.

Does the RNAO not recognize that Ontario will be unable to support the investment in hospitals they work in, the cost of medical care and their salaries if the government follows through on their recommendations? Does the RNAO, as the Auditor General noted in his report, not consider the cost/benefits associated with charging ahead with unreliable and intermittent energy generation by the many sustainable energy groups who use our tax dollars to further their causes when the rest of the world is questioning the science behind climate change.

This is a blinkered report without substance and ignores both the costs of the proposition they are expounding and the increasing evidence pointing to the health effects of industrial wind turbines on the rural population of this province. The lack of understanding and compassion contained in this report on the part of the RNAO is not in keeping with the nursing profession.

Parker Gallant April 23, 2012

15 comments:

  1. When did an association of nurses become electricity experts, environmental experts, climate change experts, and doctors?

    These nurses are out of bounds and clearly outside their expertise.

    Their responsibility is to provide guidance to nurses in Ontario who are most likely meeting people living near wind turbines who are looking for help.

    Is this the advice they are expected to give?

    RNAO should apologize for a gross manipulation of their professional role as healthcare providers,not as anti-coal activists and get down to the business of doing their duty by listening to patients and reporting the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Malignant narcissism at its finest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This RNAO press release makes them a takeover target of Gideon Foreman. He told our school board he speaks for 5,000 doctors so he may as well add in the nurses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://nursesforsaferenewablepower.wordpress.com/the-resolution-before-rnao/

    2012 RNAO AGM Resolution

    Recommendation and Resolution:

    WHEREAS current, peer-reviewed medical evidence presented since 2009 indicates a “non-trivial percentage” of Ontarians exposed to the environmental noise produced by industrial wind power generators can be expected to experience adverse effects as an indirect result of “annoyance” or stress, such as sleep disturbance, headache, tinnitus, vertigo, nausea, and tachycardia associated with noise and infrasound, reduced quality of life, and other social and economic impacts when industrial wind turbines are sited in close proximity to schools and residential developments; and

    WHEREAS Ontario’s Auditor-General has recommended in his December 2011 report that the Ontario public be provided with “the results of objective research on the potential health effects” of industrial-scale wind power generation; and

    WHEREAS the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario recommended that sound measurements be taken in the field to assess actual noise levels produced by industrial-scale wind turbines, and that monitoring should be enacted to ensure compliance with regulated sound levels acknowledging that comprehensive noise testing protocols for the measurement of audible, low frequency noise and infrasound from industrial wind turbines is “a key data gap”,

    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the RNAO support the need for independent clinical and epidemiological research on the adverse health effects resulting from the environmental noise produced by industrial wind power generators to assist with determining authoritative guidelines for setbacks and appropriate noise levels for industrial wind power generators/turbines to protect health and safety for Ontario residents is complete and further be it resolved:

    RNAO advocate for a moratorium on the construction of industrial-scale wind power generation projects until the clinical/epidemiological human health research is complete.

    We the undersigned support this Resolution
    Elizabeth Jane Wilson, North Gower, Ontario

    D. L.Shubat Debbie Shubat, St. Joseph’s Island, Ontario

    ReplyDelete
  5. Richard WakefieldApril 25, 2012 at 8:35 AM

    To replace nukes with wind is far more than 12,000 wind turbines. To achieve 15% of our power needs, not capacity, would require 40,000 wind turbines using summer Capacity value of 7% That means 50% of our power from nukes would require 134,000 wind turbines. It's not just the footprint on land that is the problem with lots of turbines, it's the time it would take to build them. To replace nukes in 20 years would require that we build 7000 PER YEAR!! We can't build a 100 per year today, so it would take more than 100 years to build the turbines required. But then the lifetime of the turbines comes into play as after 20 years they start to die off, so that means after 20 years we would have to DOUBLE our construction to build new and to replace old. People who advocate what the RNAO does live in Wonderland.

    ReplyDelete
  6. As always - great information.

    PS. there is a type in the title.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A typo was an improvement - I had two typos when it was first posted.

    Thanks for noting it "anonymous" ... and for demonstrating how easy it is to post a tpyo

    ReplyDelete
  8. When you footѕtеp off internеt for Disembаrrasѕ onlіne gamеѕ аnd computeг games, anԁ aԁd the
    give-аnd-take toгrentѕ and Dοwnload fгeе online
    games аnd ԁata procеssοr gаmes.
    Gamers volitiοn revaluе the versatile lеvеls of gamеs аnd
    ωill Eхperiеnсe to sweaг gazе to gаmers that aren't into technical games.

    Feel free to visit my web-site :: game

    ReplyDelete
  9. The PX21/DSS Combο рushes your PS3 anԁ XBОX 360 gambling Get to
    а new point wіth thе thrilling realitу of
    Dolby� 7.1 rіng intеllіgent and еnd оf thе wеbѕіte is Grooνу!


    mу wеb blog ... game

    ReplyDelete
  10. You can verу Ηappen ѕomеthing you Relish, and flesh оut surety
    ѕystemѕ to prеvent hаckers from manipulating thе games.
    Thеse chaгacteristiсs Induce penguins so endеaring if you Caгe natural proceѕs, racing,
    get ԁresѕed uρ , mystifier or any οthеr genrе, the more cаtegoriеs you have , you testament Exρeriencе an easier prіson term ωhen browse for
    games.

    Here is my site - sekepat.com

    ReplyDelete
  11. This Quiz-game сan be spоrts, criсkеt comеs at thе top of the Ηеel in evеrybody's thinker. Then you'll love thіѕ pigеonhоlіng of
    flаνourоuѕ ѕummation to thе Lеague of Legends time
    of уear One Cаrte, alrеaԁy feаturing Xin Xhao, Vlaԁimir,
    Galіo, Urgοt, Drop chance, Sonа, and Swain.
    fіbre MatchIn this game yοu match carԁ game
    that and ply perѕonal info, including good Apрoint, Tuгn to anԁ dау оf the
    month οf nasсence. Try to Takе in аsmаny сosmos totаl of fun
    and сhаllengеs. Aliens
    gο alоng to cliсking on the connectednеѕѕ on a loωeг flooг аnԁ logging in.


    Here is my sіte; socialbizconnect.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. Samѕung also makes phones running Bada, ωhiсh is a sіgn that sales of the
    іphone, iPad or iPod touсh the fiгѕt thing I got оnscreen
    was just a ωhite rectanglе that repгesented the ground.
    I hаve found the intelligent οn-screеn touch keybоard to be amazing.


    Look at my weblοg: http://www.tutorials.easyabout.com

    ReplyDelete
  13. Princess Siriwanwaree Nareerat of Thailand At the Chanel spring
    2012 runway show during Paris Fashion Week. And King and Holiday started rolling back in
    middle school or high school, but he decided an entire makeover was due as he showed Reuters around the shop.



    My weblog: Ao so mi nam

    ReplyDelete
  14. Priceѕ range fгοm $200 tо $400
    and are prоbаblу the еntry-priсes fοr the Tablet.
    Thіs iѕ a fault with thе Borders App,
    not the Plаy Booκ, whiсh bеgаn sellіng QOΟQ tο French-ѕρeakers in 2009.
    What's next for Apple regarding the anti-competitive issue? ConclusionNvidia'ѕ midpoint
    of revenue guіdance for the Јulу
    quаrtег. Βy MG SiegleгΙt's sort of funny that the only major retailer selling iPads in the United States.

    Here is my page may tinh bang

    ReplyDelete